Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Baumgardner

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 13, 1971No. 740-1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, C.J.

The minor plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment dismissing her claim for negligence against the defendants Hobart. The claim for negligence is based on the Hobarts’ alleged illegal parking of their car in an unmarked intersection at N.E. 65th Street and 34th Avenue N.E. in Seattle, Washington. Plaintiff contends that defendants Hobart were either guilty of negligence per se, or the issue of their negligence raises questions of fact precluding the entry of summary judgment under CR 56.

N.E. 65th Street in Seattle is a 36-foot-wide street running in an easterly-westerly direction. A 6-foot…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lyle v. FioritoWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. White v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Comfort v. PennerWashington Supreme Court · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mathis v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Yurkovich v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Lawson v. Safeway Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Mathis v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Nesmith v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API