Fluhart v. Seattle Electric Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered October 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian struck by a street car.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
— Action by W. H. Fluhart against Seattle Electric Company, a corporation, for damages resulting from pei’sonal injuries. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, the defendant has appealed.
Numerous assignments of error have been presented, but we will only discuss appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying its motions for a nonsuit, a directed verdict, and judgment non obstante veredicto. Galer street, in the city of Seattle, running east and west, is intersected by Queen Anne avenue and parallel cross-streets' known as First avenue west, Second avenue west, Third avenue west…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Dimuria v. Seattle Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Skinner v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by42 opinions
- Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Silverstein v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Richmond v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Mouso v. Bellingham & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Hynek v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.