Legal Opinion
Orellana v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 25, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated July 16, 1992, as denied their motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiffs failed to offer any evidence in support of their motion to restore the action to the trial calendar beyond their unsupported allegations that the City was on notice concerning the allegedly defective sidewalk. Therefore, the trial court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howlan v. RosolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Miller v. Hilman Kelly Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Marguess v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by8 opinions
- HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. HallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. v. CicchielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- 32nd Avenue LLC v. Angelo Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Nacipucha v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- Burnside v. FogliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.