Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hilman Kelly Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1991No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Defendants’ notices to admit were palpably improper. Defendants did not seek admissions with respect to " 'clear-cut matters of fact’ ” about which they reasonably believed there could be no dispute or controversy (Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3123:1, at 710, citing Spawton v Strates Shows, 75 Misc 2d 813, 814; see, CPLR 3123 [a]; Taylor v Blair, 116 AD2d 204, 206). Instead, defendants sought admissions of contested ultimate issues by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BlairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Villa v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Spawton v. James E. Strates Shows, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 32nd Avenue LLC v. Angelo Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Orellana v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Washington v. Alco Auto SalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Miller v. Hilman Kelly Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API