Legal Opinion
Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. v. Cicchiello
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 1, 2000PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered June 7, 1999, which granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment to the extent of granting it summary judgment on its cause of action for unjust enrichment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.
In this action for unjust enrichment, conversion and breach of contract to recover excess commission payments to defendant in the amount of $14,543, plaintiff served defendant with a notice to admit that she received and did not return such excess payments, essentially repeating the allegations…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Orellana v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Washington v. Alco Auto SalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hawthorne Group v. RRE VenturesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Firmes v. Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- 32nd Avenue LLC v. Angelo Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Jet One Group, Inc. v. Halcyon Jet Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- MTGLQ Invs., LP v. ColladoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.