Legal Opinion

Marguess v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment dismissing the complaint at the end of the plaintiff’s case, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Although we do not mitigate in any vtay the remissness of the defendant city in its culpably neglectful treatment of the plaintiff’s notice to admit, we feel the answer of the city and the limited admission of the defendant Surface put the plaintiff on notice he would be put to his full proof as to all the essential elements of his case. Furthermore, the sweeping, generalized demands of the plaintiff’s notice, relating to questions of ultimate liability, were not attuned to any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rusnak v. DobyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. In re the Estate of KellyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  3. D'Anna v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howlan v. RosolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Orellana v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API