Legal Opinion

Nacipucha v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Paul A. Victor, J.

Relief Sought

Plaintiffs, via an order to show cause served upon the City of New York, seek leave for late filing of a notice of claim nunc pro tunc against the New York City Board of Education and the New York City Department of Education. The defendant, City of New York, cross-moves to dismiss.

A Mea Culpa Opportunity

This motion, made by plaintiffs, presents a platform to remedy, as well as clarify, a prior decision made by this court which erroneously held that, as a result of the enactment of chapter 91 of the Laws of 2002, the City of New York (and not…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Williams v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Henry v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Titusville Iron Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Cicio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bacchus v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Padilla v. Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Montgomery-Costa v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Mamot v. BilingualDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  5. Matson v. BD. OF EDUC., CITY SCHOOL DIST. OF NYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API