Nevius v. Bank of Lansingburgh
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent Circuit. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J.:
In this case plaintiff in error was sued below on a guaranty of a negotiable note which had been endorsed to him, and also as endorser of another note; and judgment was rendered against him on both.
The guaranty was upon a note which was endorsed by the payee to him without recourse, and was in these words: “For value received I hereby guaranty the payment of the balance due on the within note. J. S. Nevius.’’ It was objected that this was not shown to be a contract made with the plaintiff below, but the objection was overruled. We think there was no error in the decision. This…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Thomas v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Newberry v. Trowbridge & OwenMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gardner v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Newberry v. TrowbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1865