Legal Opinion

Nevius v. Bank of Lansingburgh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kent Circuit. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

In this case plaintiff in error was sued below on a guaranty of a negotiable note which had been endorsed to him, and also as endorser of another note; and judgment was rendered against him on both.

The guaranty was upon a note which was endorsed by the payee to him without recourse, and was in these words: “For value received I hereby guaranty the payment of the balance due on the within note. J. S. Nevius.’’ It was objected that this was not shown to be a contract made with the plaintiff below, but the objection was overruled. We think there was no error in the decision. This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Thomas v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Newberry v. Trowbridge & OwenMichigan Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Newberry v. TrowbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API