Legal Opinion

Gage v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1995No. 93-030; CA A86719PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Petitioners oppose an amendment to a planned unit development (PUD) for which respondent FP-35 Partners applied and which the City of Portland’s hearings officer approved. The city had approved the original preliminary development plan in 1981 and granted final approval of the original plan in 1984. The amendment was sought in 1991. Between the time of the approval of the original plan and the application for the amendment, the city adopted PCC Chapter 33.299, which regulates the “disturbance of forests. ” PCC 33.299.030(C) prohibits “[c]utting, damaging, or removing vegetation” in forests.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Reusser v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. PacifiCorp v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. McCoy v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Johnson v. Landwatch Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Gutoski v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Central Oregon LandWatch v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API