Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. United States Secretary of Labor
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the agency record pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56.1. Plaintiffs challenge the United States Department of Labor’s (“Labor” or “Department”) determination that the former employees of Shaw Pipe, Incorporated’s (“Shaw Pipe”) Highland, Pennsylvania facility are not eligible for certification to receive trade adjustment assistance benefits because they do not produce an article within the meaning of 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(3) (1994). Plaintiffs assert Labor’s determination that plaintiffs are ineligible for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Rosemary Fortin v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary, Department of Labor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Robert W. Pemberton v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary, Department of Labor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Former Employees of CSX Oil and Gas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998