Legal Opinion
Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. United States Secretary of Labor
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 6, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-59. Nos. 95-04-00482PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is an application by plaintiffs’ counsel for an award of attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1994) and U.S. CIT R. 68. The Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), in relevant part, provides
§ 2412. Costs and fees(d)(1)(A) Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party ... unless the court finds…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Benerethia McGill v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Edward Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Gary D. Austin, Ann Crispin, Arlana Hines, Anola Nightengale v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Turtle Island Restoration Network v. MallettUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Former Employees of Motorola Ceramic Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Automatic Plastic Molding, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003