Legal Opinion
Calhoun v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 27, 1949No. 33452PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover actual ($1,811.79) and punitive ($1,000) damages alleged to have resulted from fraudulent misrepresentations made to her by defendants with the intention same be acted upon, and upon which she relied to her detriment by purchasing a going business and then being forced to vacate and abandon same because of sale of the building. The pleadings and evidence reflect substantially the following facts:
Defendant Calhoun was a salesman employed by defendants Beardon and Hutton, a partnership engaged in the real estate business. Shortly before the transactions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Berry v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Johnson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Blackstock Oil Co. v. CastonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Meyer & Greenwald Construction Co. v. Salina Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. John's Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Clovis v. ClovisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Beavers v. Lamplighters Realty, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Harrell v. Old American Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991