Legal Opinion

Johnson v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1934No. 21895PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants to recover a judgment for an alleged balance on a promissory note. The defense was misrepresentation and fraud in the inducement leading up to the execution thereof, The cause was tried to the court. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed.

The questions presented to this court for determination are: Was fraud sufficiently alleged and proven, and was there a sufficient restoration or offer to restore? Those were questions of fact upon which the court passed, and there being competent evidence reasonably…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stapleton v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Croslin v. Enerlex, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. Volcanic Gardens Management Co. v. Paxson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
  4. Singleton v. LePakSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Johnson v. EagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API