Johnson v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants to recover a judgment for an alleged balance on a promissory note. The defense was misrepresentation and fraud in the inducement leading up to the execution thereof, The cause was tried to the court. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed.
The questions presented to this court for determination are: Was fraud sufficiently alleged and proven, and was there a sufficient restoration or offer to restore? Those were questions of fact upon which the court passed, and there being competent evidence reasonably…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Stapleton v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Croslin v. Enerlex, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Volcanic Gardens Management Co. v. Paxson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
- Singleton v. LePakSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Johnson v. EagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.