Legal Opinion

Beavers v. Lamplighters Realty, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 2, 1976No. 48700PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.

Plaintiff, the prospective purchaser of an Oklahoma City home, was warned by the realty salesman that “If you are going to do anything, you had better do it pretty quick, because I’ve got a buyer for it . . the original builder and he is coming in . . . with a check . . . within the hour.” This, alleges plaintiff, was a lie which induced him to agree to pay more for the house than he otherwise would have had to had he known the truth.

These facts defendant Lamplighters Realty, Inc. 1 admitted to be true for the purpose of demurring to plaintiff Beavers’ evidence — a plea…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Prescott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Myron J. PalermoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Cynthia Keehr and Bruce Keehr v. Consolidated Freightways of Delaware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Pringle Tax Service, Inc. v. KnoblauchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API