Hirschman v. Healy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Hoi/fi, J.
The counterclaim was dismissed and a verdict directed for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the order denying a new trial.
The record discloses that in July, 1917, defendant, after an examination of a 5,000-acre tract of land in northern Michigan, bought the same on contract from Interstate Farms Company for $89,585.64. Thirty-three thousand dollars were paid in cash, and 10 promissory notes given for $56,585.64. In October of the same year this plaintiff bought the notes before maturity, took an assignment of the contract, and a deed to the land as collateral security. Before this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neblett v. MacFarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Knappen v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- MacLaren v. CochranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Brown v. NormanMississippi Supreme Court · 1888
- Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kousisis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
- Digital Resource v. Abacor, Inc. (In Re Digital Resource, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Dale v. First National Bank of RushmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Lowrie v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Magnuson v. BouckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.