Legal Opinion

Hirschman v. Healy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1925No. 24,360PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hoi/fi, J.

The counterclaim was dismissed and a verdict directed for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the order denying a new trial.

The record discloses that in July, 1917, defendant, after an examination of a 5,000-acre tract of land in northern Michigan, bought the same on contract from Interstate Farms Company for $89,585.64. Thirty-three thousand dollars were paid in cash, and 10 promissory notes given for $56,585.64. In October of the same year this plaintiff bought the notes before maturity, took an assignment of the contract, and a deed to the land as collateral security. Before this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neblett v. MacFarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Knappen v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. MacLaren v. CochranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Brown v. NormanMississippi Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kousisis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  2. Digital Resource v. Abacor, Inc. (In Re Digital Resource, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  3. Dale v. First National Bank of RushmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Lowrie v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Magnuson v. BouckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API