Clark v. Wells
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for "Ramsey county against W. A. Wells and H. W. pfennig to recover $25,000. The facts are stated in the opinion. Tbe case was tried before Brill, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendants. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
This is an action to recover back the purchase price paid by plaintiff for the business and property of the Prussian Remedy Oo. The complaint, among other things, contains allegations to the effect that plaintiff purchased such business from defendants for the sum of $25,000 paid to them in money and property; that he was induced to make such purchase by fraudulent misrepresentations made by them; that, upon learning of the’ fraud, he rescinded the purchase, notified defendants thereof, and tendered the business and property back to them in substantially the same condition as when…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Barnett v. SpeirSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Marple v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Potter v. TaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- McCarty v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. Register Pub. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Mahurin v. SchmeckArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Perkins v. MeyertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Fryer v. CampbellWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.