MacLaren v. Cochran
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of $1,180.77, entered in the district court for Eamsey county, pursuant to the decision and order of Vilas, J., before whom the action was tried without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This action is for the recovery of the amount of a negotiable promissory note for $1,000, executed by the defendants to one Eeaser in November, 1887, and payable 90 days after its date. The plaintiff alleges the indorsement of the note, for value and before maturity, by the payee to one Espy, and bythe latter to himself. The defendants aver that the execution of the note was procured by false and fraudulent representations of Eeaser and Espy, (to be hereafter more fully stated,) of which the plaintiff is alleged to have had knowledge; and it is denied that he purchased the note in good faith *256a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Valton v. . the National Fund Life Assurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Merchants' Exchange Bank v. LuckowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Cochran v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Martin v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Barber v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
3Cited by29 opinions
- Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Kousisis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
- Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Peterson v. McManusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.