Legal Opinion

Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided December 30, 1947No. Civil Action No. 413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARR, District Judge.

This is a suit under the patent laws of the United States. Plaintiff is an Ohio Corporation, and defendant is a Michigan corporation with an established place of business in the city of Buchanan within this judicial district.

Plaintiff is the assignee and owner of the following patents and charges infringement thereof by defendant: Riemen-schneider No. 1,810,112, issued June 16, 1931, for a “Process for Welding Metal Tubing”; Riemenschneider No. 1,948,801, issued February 27, 1934, for “Method and Apparatus for Welding”; Riemenschnei-der No. 2,061,671, issued November 24,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  2. Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1950
  3. Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1950
  4. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API