Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided September 22, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STARR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Don E. Hughes, the patentee and owner of United States Letters Patent No. 2,227,090 issued December 31, 1940, on application filed April 1, 1940, for improvements in a “crushing and grinding machine,” filed complaint alleging infringement by defendant Salem Co-operative Company, Inc., a Michigan nonprofit corporation. He asked for an injunction against further infringement and for damages, costs of suit, and attorney fees. Upon its motion and with plaintiff s consent, the Prater Pulverizer Company, an Illinois corporation, which manufactured and sold to defendant…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Belden v. Air Control Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1956
- Southwest Industrial Products, Inc. v. Ezee Stone Cutter Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
- Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956