Legal Opinion
Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1949No. 10781PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The appellant sought remedies for alleged infringement of four patents and appeals from a decree denying it relief. The patents lie in the welding art, were all granted to Riemenschneider and assigned to the appellant. The first is No. 1,810,- 112 for a process'for welding metal tubing, granted June 16, 1931 upon an application filed August 6, 1930. This patent discloses the inventor’s basic concept, and the succeeding patents reveal improvements in the process and apparatus for carrying it out. They were granted on co-pending applications and are No. 1,948,801 granted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- D'Arcy Spring Co. v. Marshall Ventilated Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Noonan v. Chester Park Athletic Club Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gustav H. Bobertz, Jr. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Bucky v. SeboCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Thabet Manufacturing Company, D.B.A. American Beauty Ventilated Aluminum Awning Company v. Kool Vent Metal Awning Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Glenway Maxon, Jr. v. Maxon Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Dow Chemical Co. v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.