Ammex, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This case was recently before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment raising the issue of standing.1 Initially, through consolidated proceedings,2 the plaintiff Ammex averred that it was entitled to a tax refund in the aggregate of $6,090,975 in federal manufacture’s excise taxes that it allegedly paid to its suppliers when it purchased gasoline and diesel fuel for resale at its duty-free store in Detroit, Michigan. By its motion for summary judgment,3 the defendant challenged plaintiffs legal standing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cornell v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Keeton Corrections, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Shirlington Limousine & Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.