Keeton Corrections, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MEROW, Senior Judge.
The matter is now before the court on defendant-intervenor’s motion for reconsideration of the March 9, 2004 Opinion granting declaratory judgment that the Federal Bureau of Prison’s (“BOP”) override of the automatic stay lacked a rational basis. In the Redacted Opinion, filed March 17, 2004, the court held that the BOP’s override based on the alleged illegality regarding the continued use of purchase orders during the protest period was unsupported by the administrative record and contrary to existing law. Keeton Corr., Inc. v. United States, 59 Fed. Cl. 753 (2004).…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- PGBA, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Keeton Corrections, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Griswold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Shirlington Limousine & Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- UnitedHealth Military & Veterans Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Csc Government Solutions LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.