Legal Opinion
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 22, 2006No. Nos. 04-74C, 04-75CPublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
On October 27, 2006, plaintiff submitted PG & E’s Motion to Amend Findings and Judgment (PL’s Mot. or Motion) on Part II.B.2.a of the trial opinion issued on this case on October 13, 2006, see Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. United States (PG & E), 73 Fed.Cl. 333, 424-27 (2006) (Trial Opinion). Given the scope of plaintiffs Motion, the court deems it to be a Motion for Reconsideration and acts on it accordingly.
*780I. Briefing
Plaintiff “moves the [cjourt, pursuant to Rules [of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) ] 52(b) and ... 59(a)(1), to amend its findings ... and ...…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Griswold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Seldovia Native Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Shirlington Limousine & Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Griffin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Webster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.