Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Coyne

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1904No. 113PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

192 U.S. 418 (1904)

CORNELL

v.

COYNE.

No. 113.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 18, 19, 1904.

Decided February 23, 1904.

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.

Mr. William E. Mason and Mr. Charles W. Greenfield, with whom Mr. Lewis F. Mason and Mr. Charles E. Kremer were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General McReynolds for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The contention is that inasmuch as this filled cheese was manufactured under…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  2. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. United States v. E. C. Knight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API