Legal Opinion

McNemee v. Farmers Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 14, 1980No. 51,713PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

This is a direct appeal by plaintiff, Donald R. McNemee, from an order of the district court upholding an exclusion in policies covering nonoccupied vehicles as authorized by K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 40-3108(a). The exclusion precludes “stacking” medical personal injury protection (PIP) benefits.

To obtain insurance loss payments on duplicate coverages is often referred to as “stacking,” and the word stacking refers to the ability of an insured to recover under two or more endorsements for a single loss suffered by the insured.

The facts of this case…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Davis v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Ballweg v. Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Lemoi v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API