Legal Opinion

Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1976No. 47,911PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Owsley, J.:

This is an action brought by the surviving spouse of Thomas H. Van Hoozer to recover from the defendant insurance company under two automobile insurance policies, each providing uninsured motorist coverage. The insurance company appeals from the findings, preliminary rulings, and final judgment of the trial court. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for the assessment of attorneys’ fees.

On February 21, 1967, Thomas H. Van Hoozer made application to the defendant, Farmers Insurance Exchange (hereinafter…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  5. Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Royal-Globe Insurance v. CravenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Spencer v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API