Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 17, 1981No. 52,060PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is an appeal by Western Casualty & Surety Company from an order of the district court: (1) authorizing the stacking of benefits of three uninsured motorist coverages; (2) authorizing the stacking of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits of three coverages; and (3) retrospectively applying the repeal of K.S.A. 1976 Supp. 40-3113(c) relative to the setoff of paid PIP benefits from uninsured motorist benefits due.

The appeal is before us upon an agreed statement of the case pursuant to Supreme Court Rule No. 3.05 (225 Kan. xxxvii).…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. Tucker v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kansas Racing Management, Inc. v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Upshaw v. Trinity CompaniesTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hines v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Halley v. BarnabeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. Moore v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API