Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Whitehall Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 14, 1966No. 64 Civ. 2295PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 37(a), F.R.Civ.P. for an order compelling answers to various questions propounded upon oral examination. Plaintiff also moves pursuant to Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P. for an order compelling production of all records and documents in defendant’s files *360concerning: (1) tests conducted on defendant's product “Heet” between 1957 and 1961; (2) claims and complaints received by defendant from other users of “Heet” between July 3, 1960 and the present.

At oral argument defendant consented to answer the questions propounded upon oral examination, to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Guilford National Bank v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  3. Luey v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
  4. Cohen v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  5. Dimenco v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Chicago Cutlery Co. v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Bellinger v. Deere & Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1995
  4. Shang v. Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Hameed v. Egyptair Airlines CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API