Cohen v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
The complaint alleges defendant manufactured and sold its product “Cheer”, which was used by plaintiff, and as such product proved dangerous, plaintiff was injured thereby.1 Defendant objects to plaintiff’s interrogatories Nos. 19, 20 and 21.
Interrogatory No. 19 asks for the names and addresses of all defendant’s *302agents and employees who have knowledge concerning communications from the public to defendant on the subject of the harmfulness of “Cheer”. Interrogatory No. 20 asks for the names and addresses of everyone to whom defendant has made any payment on account of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Drake v. HerrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Cohen v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. Amway Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Luey v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
- Bowen v. Whitehall Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Dimenco v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- Tytel v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.