Legal Opinion
Dimenco v. Pennsylvania Railroad
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 9, 1956No. Civ. A. 1600PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
This action to recover damages arises out of minor-plaintiff’s injuries sus*500tained when he and his bicycle were involved in an accident with defendant’s locomotive at a railroad crossing in New Castle, Delaware.1 Certain of plaintiffs’ interrogatories read:
“1. For the period beginning with the date that defendant initially operated a train or trains upon its tracks located as described and alleged in paragraph 4 of the Complaint (the allegations of which are admitted by paragraph 4 of the defendant’s Answer to the Complaint) and ending with' the present time, give a brief…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- City of Chicago v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Wright v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Lever Bros. Co. v. Atlas Assur. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Interstate Motor Lines, Inc. v. Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Reddick v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1969
- Holliman v. Redman Development Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1973
- Bowen v. Whitehall Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Trice v. BarnettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.