Legal Opinion

Norton v. Hinson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 1999No. 99-76PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This is a probate case. The question presented is whether a will is valid if one of the attesting witnesses was less than eighteen years old when she signed it. The trial court ruled that the will was invalid. Mary Norton, the residual trustee under the will deemed invalid, appeals that ruling. We affirm.

Goldia Sevier Horne died testate at the age of ninety-nine. Soon thereafter, the probate court entered an order probating a typed will Ms. Horne executed on June 24, 1989. About a month later, Mary J. Norton, the decedent’s caregiver of several years, filed a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. EllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Milam v. Bank of CabotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Lineham v. HydeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. Helena Regional Medical Center v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. In re Guardianship of W.L.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Citifinancial Retail Services Division of Citicorp Trust Bank, FSB v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API