Legal Opinion

Citifinancial Retail Services Division of Citicorp Trust Bank, FSB v. Weiss

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 17, 2008No. 07-551PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Citifinancial Retail Services Division of Citicorp Trust Bank (Citifinancial) appeals a Pulaski County Circuit Court order granting summary judgment in favor of the Arkansas Department of Finance & Administration (DF&A). The circuit court found that Citifinancial was not a “taxpayer” under Ark. Code Ann. § 26-52-309 (Supp. 2005), and therefore was not entitled to a refund for sales taxes paid on defaulted consumer credit accounts. The circuit court also determined that the absence of a statutory provision allowing for the assignment of tax refunds barred Citifinancial’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. SunTrust Bank, Nashville v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. McDonald v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Puget Sound National Bank v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pledger v. Baldor International, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Pledger v. C.B. Form Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. Healthport, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Sherwood Forest Country Club v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. Weiss v. Bryce Co., LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. State Department of Revenue v. Wells Fargo Financial Acceptance Alabama, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Dept. of Taxes / Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Dept. of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API