Legal Opinion

Lineham v. Hyde

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 2015No. CV-15-126PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhonda K. Wood, Associate Justice

h Under our guardianship statutes, a court may terminate a guardianship if it is no longer necessary or if it is in the ward’s best' interest. We hold that a guardianship is no longer necessary when a fit parent who consented to a guardianship revokes consent. Here, the circuit court’s ruling that the father, David Lineham, was unfit was clearly erroneous. Therefore, the court should have granted David’s petition to terminate a guardianship to which he had earlier consented. We reverse the order keeping the guardianship in place and remand for the court to enter an order terminating the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Linder v. LinderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Slaton v. SlatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Lloyd v. ButtsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Bullock v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Donley v. DonleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. In re Guardianship of W.L.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Bank of the Ozarks v. CosseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Tracie F. v. Francisco D.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API