Lineham v. Hyde
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtRhonda K. Wood, Associate Justice
h Under our guardianship statutes, a court may terminate a guardianship if it is no longer necessary or if it is in the ward’s best' interest. We hold that a guardianship is no longer necessary when a fit parent who consented to a guardianship revokes consent. Here, the circuit court’s ruling that the father, David Lineham, was unfit was clearly erroneous. Therefore, the court should have granted David’s petition to terminate a guardianship to which he had earlier consented. We reverse the order keeping the guardianship in place and remand for the court to enter an order terminating the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Linder v. LinderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Slaton v. SlatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Lloyd v. ButtsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Bullock v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Donley v. DonleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- In re Guardianship of W.L.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Bank of the Ozarks v. CosseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Tracie F. v. Francisco D.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.