United States v. Strode
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES, Senior Judge:
This case requires us to determine whether Airman Strode’s mistaken belief about a victim’s age was inconsistent with his guilty pleas to allegations of sodomy with a child and indecent acts with a child. We began our analysis with the expectation that the same mistaken belief in these factually related offenses would lead us to the same answer for both offenses. However, we discovered that the statutory language on which the allegations rest led us to different, results.
Airman Strode pleaded guilty to sodomy with a girl under 16 years of age and to an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ellis v. JacobUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. CarrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. ReedNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. StrodeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. ZacharyArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. EverettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.