United States v. Everett
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
YOUNG, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of rape and forcible sodomy. Article 120 (10 U.S.C. § 920 (1988)) and Article 125 (10 U.S.C. § 925 (1988)), UCMJ. Court members sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 6 months, and reduction to E-l. Appellant asserts that the military judge erred in failing to suppress his confession to sodomy because it lacked corroboration, improperly limited his cross-examination of the alleged victim, and made four instructional errors on findings. We find prejudicial error in the instructions and set aside…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. DuvallUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996