Legal Opinion

Turkenkoph v. Te Beest

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1951No. 5376PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COORS, Justice.

'The material facts in the case were ■established by substantial evidence and are undisputed. All of them (except a few ■hereinafter specifically mentioned) were •contained in the trial court’s findings of fact. We therefore deem it wholly unnecessary here to state all the evidence or facts, but only those few which are pertinent to the question of law to be decided.

The only question of law necessary to a ■decision is this: In an action brought by the last assignee and holder of a negotiable promissory note transferred to him by an assignor in good faith and upon valuable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Nye v. Board of Com'rs of Eddy CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Harris v. EsterbrookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Community Bank v. EllOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. United Overseas Bank v. Veneers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  3. State v. MontielNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API