Legal Opinion
Nye v. Board of Com'rs of Eddy County
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1932No. 3748PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
By peremptory mandamus, the board of county commissioners of Eddy county has been ordered to pay a claim of the county clerk for one month’s “additional compensation,” under 1929 Comp., § 33-3202; she having personally performed the duties of clerk of the district court.
The merit of the board’s appeal depends upon the meaning of the section cited, enacted as section 2 of the Salary Act of 1915. For present purposes, amendments are immaterial.
Counties having been classified according to assessed valuation 'by the preceding section, section 33-3202, in so far as we deem it material here,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fancher v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- State ex rel. Ward v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Otto v. FieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- State ex rel. Delgado v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. Southern Pac. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Montoya v. McManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Mountain Cement Co. v. South of Laramie Water & Sewer DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Great Western Construction Co. v. N. C. Ribble Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Town of Silver CityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.