Legal Opinion

Harris v. Esterbrook

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1929No. File No. 6532PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

On January 13, 1926, respondent Esterbrook executed and delivered to Moody County Bank his negotiable promissory note for $221.50, due April 1, 1926. On January 18, 1926, appellant Harris bought the note from the bank, paying face value and accrued interest therefor, and received the note. It was never indorsed 'by the bank. On May 22, 1926, the bank was taken over by the superintendent of banks for liquidation. On the clay of the transfer respondent had on deposit $7.94. When the bank sus*540pended, respondent had $133.22 on deposit. Respondent claimed the right to set off the $133.22…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Leonard Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. RosenbushMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Harrisburg Trust Co. v. ShufeldtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  4. Steinhilper v. . BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Martz v. State National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Futrall v. McKennonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Turkenkoph v. Te BeestNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Furbee v. FurbeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Kalen v. GeldermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Agricultural Credit Corp. v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API