Legal Opinion

In Re Ball

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 27, 1936No. Patent Appeal 3522PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 29, 30, 32, 35, 36, 37, and 38 of appellant’s application. Certain claims were allowed by the Examiner, and certain other claims were also rejected by the Examiner, which rejection was affirmed by the Board of Appeals, but which claims are not included in the appeal before us.

The claims involved in this appeal were copied by appellant from a patent to Wilms et al., No. 1,804,729, issued May 12, 1931, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  2. In re LilienfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  3. In re EmanueliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  4. In re SponableCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  5. In re TwissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. In Re Corwin Nathan Spencer and William Henry MyersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  4. In Re: MotupalliCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API