In re Twiss
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeneoot, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, for want of patentability over the prior art, claims 1 to 10,, inclusive, 12 to 19, inclusive, and 33 and 37 of appellant’s application. Certain claims were allowed. Appellant has moved to dismiss the appeal as to all of said claims except claims 3, 6, 13, 14, 15,, 17 and 37, and it will be so ordered.
Claims 3 and 37 are illustrative of the claims before us and read as follows :
3. Tfie method of manufacturing shaped articles from an aqueous dispersion…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Anode, Inc. v. Lee-Tex Rubber Products Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
- In Re BallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936