Legal Opinion

In re Sponable

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 19, 1934No. 3241PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

Appellant here seeks review of a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner, rejecting claims 7, 8, 10, and 11 of appellant’s application for want of invention in view of the prior art. No claims were allowed.

Claim 11 is illustrative of the claims in issue and reads as follows:

11. An apparatus for reproducing combined moving and sound pictures comprising a screen consisting of a single thickness of woven textile fabric having openings extending from front to rear of the screen sufficient in number and size to allow sound waves to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. In Re BallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API