Legal Opinion

State v. Bondurant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1983No. 426A82PublishedCited by 312 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Guilt-Innocence Phase

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that by death qualifying the jury and excluding for cause those who expressed opposition to the death penalty, the trial court violated his rights as guaranteed by the Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Defendant concedes the decided cases are against him and presents no arguments in support of his position that were not carefully considered by this Court in State v. Avery, 299 N.C. 126, 261 S.E. 2d 803 (1980); State v. Davis, 305 N.C. 400, 290 S.E. 2d 574…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by312 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

307 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API