State v. Bondurant
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
Guilt-Innocence Phase
By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that by death qualifying the jury and excluding for cause those who expressed opposition to the death penalty, the trial court violated his rights as guaranteed by the Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Defendant concedes the decided cases are against him and presents no arguments in support of his position that were not carefully considered by this Court in State v. Avery, 299 N.C. 126, 261 S.E. 2d 803 (1980); State v. Davis, 305 N.C. 400, 290 S.E. 2d 574…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by312 opinions
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
307 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.