Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Merkle

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 24, 2014No. 17ag/13PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

On January 23, 2013, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a), directed Bar Counsel to file a “Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action” against Patrick G. Merkle (“Respondent” or “Merkle”). Petitioner charged Respondent with several violations of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MLRPC” or “Rules”), specifically MLRPC 1.1 (Competence),11.2 (Scope of Representation and Allocation *613of Authority Between Client and Lawyer),21.3 (Diligence),31.4 (Communication),4 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information),5 7.3 *614(Direc…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Attorney Grievance v. Smith-ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. WooleryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API