Legal Opinion

Daniels v. City of Goose Creek

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 3, 1993No. 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Thomas B. Daniels sued the City of Goose Creek and its council members (collectively referred to as “the City”) to enjoin the City from enforcing a change in the zoning of Daniels's property. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The trial court held that (1) Daniels had a vested right to the zoning as it existed when he purchased the property, (2) the City was estopped from arguing that the previous zoning was in error and from denying Daniels the right to use his property for commercial purposes, and (3) the restrictive covenants for the subdivision where Daniels’s property was located…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Town of Vienna Council v. KohlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  2. Friarsgate, Inc. v. Town of IrmoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Abbeville Arms v. City of AbbevilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. Town of Sullivans Island v. ByrumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. F.B.R. Investors v. County of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whaley v. Dorchester County Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Jernigan v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. HoughCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Lake Frances Properties v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API