Legal Opinion

State v. Hough

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 1995No. 2355PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Everett N. Hough appeals his conviction for third-degree burglary and grand larceny, arguing the trial judge abused his discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial based upon the improper admission of evidence of Hough’s alleged use of crack cocaine. Hough also alleges trial error based on the court’s failure to require the Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services to prepare a presentence investigation. We reverse and remand.

During his opening statement to the jury, the Assistant Solicitor remarked:. . . my most important witness is Mr. James Pierce, Jr. [Hough’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. HoughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API