Legal Opinion

Lake Frances Properties v. City of Charleston

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 2002No. 3459PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Lake Frances Properties (“LFP”) instituted this action seeking damages attributed to the rezoning of its property from multi-family to single family development. The trial court found the rezoning did not constitute an unconstitutional taking and granted summary judgment in favor of the City of Charleston (the “City”). LFP appeals. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

LFP is a partnership that was created for the purpose of purchasing and developing approximately 43.12 acres of land known as Area “C”, located on James Island, South Carolina in the City of Charleston. The contract to sell from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Strother v. Lexington County Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Vermeer Carolina's, Inc. v. Wood/Chuck Chipper Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Carolina Alliance for Fair Employment v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Talbot v. Myrtle Beach Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MJJG Restaurant LLC v. Horry CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  2. Grays Hill Baptist Church v. Beaufort Cnty.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  3. Grays Hill Baptist Church v. Beaufort CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API