Legal Opinion
Jernigan v. King
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 28, 1993No. 2112PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Acting Judge:
Rodney C. Jernigan, as Guardian Ad Litem for Perry Pressley, sued physicians J. Stovall King and Kenneth S. Kammer, as well as McLeod Regional Medical Center (MRMC), for medical malpractice for injuries Perry received while being treated by King and Kammer. Kammer moved for summary judgment on the basis that he owed no duty to Perry. The trial court granted the motion and Jernigan appeals. We affirm.
Summary judgment is proper where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, SCRCP; Baugus…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whiteside v. Cherokee County School District No. OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Botehlo v. BycuraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Baugus v. WessingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Pederson v. GouldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Welch v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Burroughs v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Gooding v. St. Francis Xavier HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Montgomery v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Tumblin Ex Rel. Estate of Tumblin v. Ball-Incon Glass Packaging Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.