Moore v. W. J. Gilmore Drug Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
This action of trespass was tried by a judge without a jury. He found for the defendant, and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff moved for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto in his favor. The court in banc discharged the rule for a new trial but entered judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the plaintiff for $667.85, the trial judge dissenting. The judgment must be reversed.
When a case is tried by a judge without a jury, the trial judge takes the place of the jury and his finding on the facts has the force and effect of the verdict of a jury.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Ozanich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Lessy v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Ellsworth Et Ux. v. HusbandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jann v. Linton's LunchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Colish v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Madison v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Dixon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Merlino v. EannottiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.