Legal Opinion

Moore v. W. J. Gilmore Drug Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1938No. Appeal, 25PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This action of trespass was tried by a judge without a jury. He found for the defendant, and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff moved for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto in his favor. The court in banc discharged the rule for a new trial but entered judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the plaintiff for $667.85, the trial judge dissenting. The judgment must be reversed.

When a case is tried by a judge without a jury, the trial judge takes the place of the jury and his finding on the facts has the force and effect of the verdict of a jury.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Ozanich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Lessy v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Ellsworth Et Ux. v. HusbandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jann v. Linton's LunchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Colish v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Madison v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Dixon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Merlino v. EannottiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API