Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1939No. Appeal, 95PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit on a certificate of insurance, and the question is whether the evidence was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that the death of deceased was caused directly and independently of all other causes by accidental means, as required by the provisions of a policy of group insurance under which deceased was insured as an employee of J ones & Laughlin Steel Corporation. Defendant has appealed from the judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff, the beneficiary named in the certificate issued to deceased.

The provisions of the group policy 1…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. De Reeder v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Huffman v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Ozanich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kotlikoff v. Master, Admrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Gaspero v. GentileSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Kinavey, Admrx. v. Prud. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Hershberger v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Holland v. KohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API