Legal Opinion
Truesdale v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 13, 2010No. Civil Action 08-1862 (PLF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
In its September 29, 2009 Opinion and Order, the Court dismissed all defendants except the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ” or “defendant”), and dismissed all but two claims: one under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, with regard to FOIA Request No. 2004-02303 addressed to the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), and another under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, with regard to plaintiffs demand for amendment of records maintained in the BOP’s SENTRY database. See Truesdale v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 657…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Earle v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Truesdale v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Brooks v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Brown v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Earle v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.